The Eastwood constituency is to be retained with its existing geographical boundary for future Scottish Parliament elections, it can now be confirmed.
As part of a periodic review of Scottish Parliament constituencies and regions, Boundaries Scotland published plans in May 2023 to discontinue Eastwood as a distinct first-past-the-post seat.
Clarkston, Busby, Netherlee, Giffnock and Thornliebank were to be merged with parts of Glasgow, while Newton Mearns, Eaglesham and Waterfoot had been proposed to join with communities including Howwood, Kilbarchan and Lochwinnoch in a new constituency.
Following local inquiry meetings during December 2023, Boundaries Scotland announced in April 2024 that Eastwood would be saved but with Neilston added to the constituency.
However, in a new development, Boundaries Scotland has now set out a further revision of the constituency proposals with Eastwood to be maintained in its existing format.
Neilston has been removed from Eastwood so that it remains in a constituency with the other communities of Levern Valley, Barrhead and Uplawmoor, in a new Renfrewshire West constituency.
Boundaries Scotland has confirmed that as Eastwood has reverted to its existing boundary, the constituency is excluded from the latest consultation.
Scottish Conservative MSP for Eastwood, Jackson Carlaw said: “Eastwood is a distinct geography in its own right and as part of Boundaries Scotland’s initial consultation process, I argued strongly for the constituency to be saved.
“I was delighted to learn earlier in the year that the initial plans to remove the seat from the list of parliamentary constituencies had indeed been binned.
“In my written representation to the further consultation initiated by Boundaries Scotland in April, I highlighted there was a clear logic towards adding Neilston to Eastwood as it shares a council ward with part of Newton Mearns and it used to be included within the seat.
“However, to be consistent with the previous arguments I had made about keeping Eastwood’s communities together, I noted that this would nonetheless mean splitting Neilston from Barrhead and Uplawmoor in the Levern Valley.
“On this basis and to avoid the removal of the long-standing links between the Levern Valley communities, I argued that the more preferable option may still have been to retain Eastwood with its existing boundary.
“It is welcome that Eastwood is excluded from the new consultation and with the constituency set to be maintained for future Scottish Parliament Elections.”
For more information, visit: https://boundaries.scot/.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here